MacIver News Service | August 1, 2011
UPDATE: Recommended Reading (07/31/11)
Can’t believe I missed including the following in Sunday's Recommended Reading, especially since it’s probably the best piece I read last week:
7 Promises I Make to a Liberal
"It's no secret that liberals and conservatives don't get along. But, if there's any one thing that we've learned from the liberal love of sensitivity classes and situation comedies, it's that once people get to know each other and learn about each other's beliefs and concerns, all legitimate differences melt away. So, with that in mind, I'd like to relieve the concerns of our liberal pals by telling them what we conservatives are really like. Think of it as sensitivity class – for liberals. Granted there may be a few conservatives here and there who disagree with me on these things, but as someone who has known conservatives all my life, I can assure you that they're the exceptions, not the rule."
And I might add this as well.
An eye for an eye? Not this time
Back at the end of May while filling in for Mark Belling on Newstalk 1130 WISN, I dedicated a segment to the incredibly sad story of a young Iranian woman, Ameneh Bahrami.
Bahrami was 24, working at a laboratory in Tehran. Majid Movahedi repeatedly made offers to marry her, but she refused every time. He then threatened her saying, "I am going to destroy your life and do something so nobody will marry you."
One day he followed her home from work. As she stepped aside to let him pass, he threw a jar of sulphuric acid in her face. Bahrami lost the sight in one of her eyes even before she got to the hospital. Surgery in Spain saved the sight in the other eye, but she lost it due to an infection.
An eye for an eye? Not this time
Back at the end of May while filling in for Mark Belling on Newstalk 1130 WISN, I dedicated a segment to the incredibly sad story of a young Iranian woman, Ameneh Bahrami.
Bahrami was 24, working at a laboratory in Tehran. Majid Movahedi repeatedly made offers to marry her, but she refused every time. He then threatened her saying, "I am going to destroy your life and do something so nobody will marry you."
One day he followed her home from work. As she stepped aside to let him pass, he threw a jar of sulphuric acid in her face. Bahrami lost the sight in one of her eyes even before she got to the hospital. Surgery in Spain saved the sight in the other eye, but she lost it due to an infection.
You probably won't read these in the Journal Sentinel
Gov. Walker: Month One- Budget Working
Lt. Gov. Kleefisch: WI economy killing the competition
The big question in Franklin no one has asked or answered
Will Jim Hughes return to coach the two-time state defending summer baseball champion Franklin Sabers?

My guess is yes.
*UPDATE: THIS JUST IN BLOG BLIZZARD WARNING CANCELLED*
A normal blog frequency has now returned.
In case you missed it during the blizzard…
UPDATE: The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel now has an article about voter block parties (ribs for votes). Missing from their piece:
"In a story first reported on conservative talk radio and some blogs..."
Franklin Common Council honors Franklin state champs tonight
Tonight, the Franklin Common Council meets and on the agenda is the presentation of a special proclamation honoring the summer baseball state champion Franklin High School Sabers.
You can read the very well written proclamation here by scrolling down.
I have no idea what happened but I couldn’t help but notice that missing in the proclamation is any recognition from the city elected aldermen whom I’m positive share in their congratulations to these outstanding young student athletes.
I worked many years in the state Senate and whenever an honorary resolution was made on the Senate floor, it was customary, automatic for every state Senator to be made a Senate sponsor. It appears to me that someone at Franklin City Hall in his/her haste to crank out a proclamation forgot to include the city aldermen in what should be pretty standard fare.
If I was one of the six Council members, I wouldn’t be too happy.
The Pasch-Citizen Action - Jobs Now - BBQ - Prizes - Possible Collusion Controversy
The Media Trackers report.
Surprised?
Shocked?
Stunned?
Let's not forget:
Smokes for votes
Kringle for votes
This could be a very good idea
I'd like more details, but this concept is worth exploring.
E-mails, I get e-mails: Caylee's Law
We recently read your write up in Franklin Now regarding Caylee's Law and would like to thank you so much for supporting it. We are just two moms who started a webpage and created email lists and a form letter that our supporters could modify with their own info to send to EVERY Senator and State Representative in the state of
UPDATE: Franklin Common Council honors Franklin state champs tonight
I listened to some of the audio of Tuesday night’s Franklin Common Council meeting. Mayor Tom Taylor opened the meeting by saying Alderman Steve Taylor (who apparently reads my blog) told the mayor he was remiss in leaving out any mention of the Common Council members in the city’s proclamation honoring Franklin High’s state champion summer baseball team.
A new proclamation is being drafted and will be presented at a pep rally for the team on August 11.
Don't forget, high school sports fans...
Watch the 2011 WIAA Summer Baseball Championship Game featuring Franklin and West Bend West Thursday night at 7:00 on Fox Sports Wisconsin.
Wisconsin wise to scrap law requiring racial data collection at traffic stops
In May, the state Legislature approved repealing on the many problematic provisions in Jim Doyle’s 2009-11 state budget. The budget created a new law that the Legislative Reference Bureau described in an analysis:
“Law enforcement officers must collect, at each motor vehicle traffic stop made after December 31, 2010, all information specified by rule promulgated by the Office of Justice Assistance (OJA) in the Department of Administration (DOA). This information must then be submitted by the law enforcement agency to OJA. OJA must analyze this information to determine whether the number of motor vehicle stops and searches involving racial minorities is disproportionate compared to non-minorities.”
The budget provision as approved by the then Democrat-controlled Legislature and signed into law by Democrat Jim Doyle assumed that law enforcement is racist.
In April of 2009, the Franklin Common Council unanimously adopted a resolution opposing the record-keeping requirement for law enforcement. The data collected by authorities was to go into a new software program that police departments had to pay for. The provision was one of 80 in the budget designated by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau as non-fiscal. Therefore, it should have been debated as a separate piece of legislation outside the budget.
The Franklin Common Council and Franklin Police Chief Rick Oliva argued that the provision could violate the constitutional rights of citizens and would be impractical. At the time, Oliva gave a memo to the Franklin Common Council informing that Franklin officers conducted more than 6,000 motor vehicle stops during 2008 and that the new law would require an additional 2,000 work hours a year for department personnel. Oliva wrote, “The governor's proposed legislation is unduly burdensome to law enforcement agencies, subjects citizens to longer detainment at traffic stops, creates the perception that racial profiling exists and amounts to an unfunded mandate by the state."
Other departments around the state also expressed concern with the Racine County Sheriff going so far as to ignore it.
The chief sponsor of the bill repealing the requirement of racial data collection was Senator Mary Lazich.
The law was only in effect for the first six months of 2011. Notice how the Office of Justice Assistance (OJA) writes:
“This program represented an enormously successful effort by
However, later it writes:
“Because of the short duration of the program and its subsequent repeal, no statewide analysis of traffic stop data is feasible.”
Well, then how can you deem the effort successful?”
Other states have similar requirements, but as Stateline.org found, “little use is made of the data. States compile reports that just sit on a shelf.”
In effect, the laws are ineffective since there’s no consensus on what collected data really mean. The mandate is a total waste of time not worth the effort.
Read more here.
Is a cartoon about 9/11 wrong?
I’m not a big fan of Mike Huckabee.
Not Republican enough. I would never vote for the guy.
Huckabee is under fire for his role in an educational video (cartoon) for children about 9/11.
Critics say he has no shame and that he’s accepting “blood money.”
So now what? We are to never produce future articles, columns, books, documentaries, films, movies about 9/11?
I see absolutely nothing wrong.
A MUST READ: The GOP accomplishments in WI so far this year
From state Senator Glenn Grothman (R-West Bend).

Yes, that's Senator Grothman's license plate.
His office supplied me his latest column:
A Busy Six Months:
Yes, I'll try that at the Fair

The Elvis.
A deep fried peanut butter cup in banana batter, served on, of course, a stick.
Offered up by Lakefront Brew Pub & Eatery located at the southeast corner of
Here's

Go on!
Go for it!

Finally,
Who's more deep-fried?
Wisconsin?
Or Orange County, California?
State Fair: Protester Shouts 'Sic semper tyrannis!' at Gov. Walker
The MacIver News Service's cameras were there when a throng of about 60 protesters disrupted the opening ceremonies of the Wisconsin State Fair, shouting down Governor Scott Walker during his brief speech. Walker was one of several dignitaries at the opening ceremony of the the fair, but the only one there who is under fire from Big Labor.
'Sic semper tyrannis' is the Latin phrase meaning "thus always to tyrants." The phrase is commonly said to have originated with Brutus during the assassination of Julius Caesar. It was later shouted by John Wilkes Booth while assassinating President Abraham Lincoln.
The Wisconsin State Fair is known as one most family-friendly entertainment events every year. This year marks the 160th incarnation of the event. To show animals at the Fair, children must first become the champions in their county. Hundreds of exhibitors bring their livestock to the fair every year and there were kids in attendance Thursday to witness this stunt.
E-mails, I get e-mails: "I discovered an unknown government agency"
From an avid This Just In reader who lives near Franklin:
During all the debate about raising the debt ceiling and some politicians honestly talking about cutting government spending, I was surprised to find that big government had created yet another another big government agency.
I don't think many people even know of this department. A department that will spend $42 billion in August alone. This department is huge, too big to fail as they say. It accounts for 13.65% of the $306.7 billion the president hopes to spend in August. This agency's spending is second only to Social Security spending.
I did not know of this department either.
I happened to discover this unknown department when I stumbled upon an interactive debt ceiling bar graph on the Bloomberg Government website.
This graph is easy to use and it allows you to pick and choose what you would pay for if the debt ceiling is not raised. It has total spending at $306.7 billion and revenues at $172.4 billion. It has government spending broken down into 29 categories, such as Medicare costing $28.6 billion.
This graph is not the important thing here. The last category, the one that caught my attention, is titled "Other Spending" and the following is their definition of what this spending is.
"Most of these payments are federal obligations referred to as 'UNCLASSIFIED', meaning that the Treasury Department is unable to identify the type of spending. They may include entitlement benefits, safety net payments or defense funding. Other payments in this category cover smaller programs, such as agriculture, federal financing programs, and the U.S. Postal Service."
I have been seeing TV ads from the postal service workers union saying they take no tax money, the stamps and postage covers all the bills at the post office. I guess that’s beside the point here.
So, what does this department do? First, since this department is "unknown" I decided to give it a name. The Department of Graft, Fraud and Incompetence. The main function of the D.G.F.I. is to make tax dollars disappear. Not disappear like a magician or shredding it, it’s to disappear from any record of accountability.
When the Treasury Department says it is "unable" to identify what this spending is, it is not that they are unable; they are unwilling to identify it.
I could speculate as to what this 13.65% of government spending is for, but I don't have to. The fact that Treasury Department will not identify it tells me it is 100% waste. Not one penny of this tax money will go to anything productive for the American people.
I am sure the D.G.F.I. has many programs to cause the mysterious disappearance of so much tax money. It could be overpayment for sweetheart government contacts (GRAFT), ripping off any number of government assistance programs (FRAUD) or mismanagement by bureaucrats unqualified for their position, just plain lazy or both (INCOMPETENCE).
If the Treasury Department is "unable" to identify what this spending is, then how do they know, ahead of time, that in August the taxpayers will be ripped off for $42 billion?
I am guessing they can project this due to past history (plus they know what this spending is going for, they’re just not telling).They know that every month under President Obama that he is roughly spending $42 billion, $504 million a year, with no accountability or oversight at all.
If the Treasury Department can not account for $42 billion then either the entire department from the top to the bottom must be total incompetent boobs or they are flat out lying as to the unknown whereabouts of these funds.
This spending is an invisible stimulus plan, it is just a continuation of the $800 billion-plus, failed "visible" stimulus plan, and the money is lining the pockets of the same constituents of the president and his party.
If the CEO of a company went to his or her shareholders and said,”We can not account for what happened to 13.65% of our revenues." this CEO would be fired. At the very least someone might ask,” Do you have any idea what happened to this money?"
When the Tea Party is attacked for being unreasonable, I think flushing 13.65% of federal spending down the toilet is unreasonable and unacceptable. This invisible stimulus money is in addition to the already bloated budgets of every other government agency, and it is still not enough for this president.
I believe all this spending and the lack of accountability is all for one thing. So the Democrat party can blow up the budgetary baseline and create a situation where government spending can never be reduced to prior year’s levels.
Once you add in Obamacare's costs, those dependent on government for some sort of subsidy rise above 50% of the population (we are at 47% now) and our national debt surpasses GDP it will not be the Tea Party asking for responsible government, cutting spending and a balanced budget. It will be our Chinese creditors demanding it.
By then the
AFP: It is your government, your voice, and your vote!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||















































































































